|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 2 post(s) |
Soden Rah
Gallente EVE University Ivy League
|
Posted - 2011.06.14 12:43:00 -
[1]
I am sorry but while there are people with performance issues with this (and while my system will run it fine, and I am by no means a low end user, Nothing else but CQ makes my graphics card overheat, and I don't mean nothing else in eve, I mean nothing I have ever run on this computer) I do not consider myself to be one of them, And yet I am still calling for this to be optional (and no having a don't load station environment is not making it optional, I will however be using that option on TQ).
You have MASSIVELY missed the point. And until you address the issue of those concerned about RP, Immersion, Design limitations, UI failure, Separated graphics settings, and Pod placement, we are no more informed than we were before this dev blog...
We already knew that there was an option not to load the station environment.
(although the fact that you thought it was temporary is new, and really bad, please remove all temporary from the option).
So after our huge list of questions and concerns on the subject, you're 'just wait for the devblog' turns out to be simply telling us stuff that we already knew without answering any of our questions.... this is not helpful. Try again. __________________________________________________
Originally by: CCP Tuxford bugger, I need to have a closer look at this menu function
|
Soden Rah
Gallente EVE University Ivy League
|
Posted - 2011.06.14 13:03:00 -
[2]
Originally by: CCP Fallout If you are one who tends to run multiple EVE Online clients on one system, this blog, by CCP Zulu, tells you how you may do so with EVE Online: Incarna.
ok TL:DR of last post...
We Knew this already. It's on the test server, we have posted threads about it...
Answer the questions we actually have rather than making up questions you want us to ask and answering those.
Just like your video dev blog, this gives us no new information, If you are so pressed for time that you can't spare any more than the minimum actually talking to us then wasting it on telling us stuff we already knew is a catastrophic waste of yours and our time.
Read my questions (you know where they are), read the collected questions on test server feedback and general, and then write a dev blog that actually discusses/answers THOSE questions.
In other words, Try again. __________________________________________________
Originally by: CCP Tuxford bugger, I need to have a closer look at this menu function
|
Soden Rah
Gallente EVE University Ivy League
|
Posted - 2011.06.14 13:11:00 -
[3]
Originally by: Widemouth Deepthroat There is only CQ for Gallente?? Or everyone but only at Gallente station on launch? Or same Gallente design at all stations?
There is only Minmatarr CQ on launch. Gallente is apparently the hardest so will probably be last. __________________________________________________
Originally by: CCP Tuxford bugger, I need to have a closer look at this menu function
|
Soden Rah
Gallente EVE University Ivy League
|
Posted - 2011.06.14 14:01:00 -
[4]
Originally by: northwesten
Originally by: S'qarpium D'igil
Originally by: Rixiu Just add the possibility to first "dock" and then "exit pod" and be done with it. From a pure gameplay perspective it doesn't make any sense whatsoever to be forced to exit the pod just to change ship and being forced to load a second client all for nothing just adds on top of that.
The current implementation of incarna is fairly blunt and I really would like a more seamless experience between "old eve" and incarna. For example, I dock my ship much like I can at the moment, I choose to exit my pod and I see it leave the ship and fly to a "pod-docking" and then transported to a pod-room and from there I can do the incarna. Completely skipable sequence of course.
Also, the current hangar itself really need a revamp though, the lack of scale make our huge ships look really tiny, even after you moved them closer to the balcony.
QFT.
How many times to we have to ask you to make undocking from our pods OPTIONAL?
Are you helping out players by making the loading of the CQ optional? Yes. But you are avoiding the real issue entirely: WE DON'T WANT YOU TO FORCE THIS ON US AND BREAK COMMON SENSE AND GAME LORE IN THE PROCESS.
If they make this CQ optional then whats the problem? You just don't load up CQ just that simple but you asking them to not download CQ stuff at all means they will have to have 2 clients?
That is not what he is saying. he's asking CCP to keep the current hanger view, and have CQ as something that happens after that if you so chose (say a disembark button on the station services window). and for what's the problem... read this, and this ... __________________________________________________
Originally by: CCP Tuxford bugger, I need to have a closer look at this menu function
|
Soden Rah
Gallente EVE University Ivy League
|
Posted - 2011.06.14 15:30:00 -
[5]
Originally by: Louis deGuerre Hmmm...I can distinctly remember the captain's quarters would remain optional. When exactly was 'temporarily' inserted in there ?
The temporary is on the ability to load no station environment at all, however that is not an option to not having CQ, and the no station environment, has less functionality as the current station hanger... loaded or otherwise. __________________________________________________
Originally by: CCP Tuxford bugger, I need to have a closer look at this menu function
|
Soden Rah
Gallente EVE University Ivy League
|
Posted - 2011.06.14 15:32:00 -
[6]
Originally by: Lost Hamster What does this mean in clear text?
Those who switch off CQ, will get a black screen, no station environment, just the menus? Or they get back the current hangar view, so we can spin the ship?
as it stands on SiSi you get a static (blurry) pic of the inside of (atm the Minmatarr) CQ. You always have the old station UI. But you don't have the drag and drop functionality, and r-click select ship functionality that you do in the current hanger view. __________________________________________________
Originally by: CCP Tuxford bugger, I need to have a closer look at this menu function
|
Soden Rah
Gallente EVE University Ivy League
|
Posted - 2011.06.14 16:02:00 -
[7]
I have consolidated My questions, and your responses so far into this thread in test server feedback.
The original multi page post which ended in those questions is here.
We have been promised dev blogs with actual answers in them. Can one of you please write one. __________________________________________________
Originally by: CCP Tuxford bugger, I need to have a closer look at this menu function
|
|
|
|